A wall is, in fact, a wall!
Read the article to see the sad state of critical thinking and how it's begun to affect the way we act.
Editorials & Opinion | Don't confuse them with facts | Seattle Times Newspaper
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Don't confuse them with facts
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
Visualizing Information
Here's another example of how a well crafted image can give more information than a ton of words:
http://www.rasmussen.edu/articles/haiti-by-the-numbers.asp
http://www.rasmussen.edu/articles/haiti-by-the-numbers.asp
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Huff n puff
Way too much to do. Guess I'll spend a few minutes regenerating through laughter... Sleep Talkin' Man blog, here I come!
Thursday, January 14, 2010
Photojournalism
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/03/it-was-all-started-by-a-mouse-part-1/
Errol Morris provides insight into how photos are used to explain and to manipulate.
Errol Morris provides insight into how photos are used to explain and to manipulate.
Labels:
Errol Morris,
manipulation,
photojournalism,
propaganda
Saturday, October 17, 2009
Satire: Revealing absurdity
Two of my favorite satirists are Jon Stewart and Steven Colbert. Under the guise of humor and wit they expose the fallacious reasoning of politicians. Admittedly, they tend to do this more often with conservatives, but they call liberals and progressives to task, too. Still, currently there is a wealth of absurdity in many conservative positions. Take a look at how Stewart crafts a segment that establishes the unsupportable position a group of conservatives took on the Al Franken Rape Amendment. Pay close attention to the reasons given by the Republicans for voting against the policy change.
The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
Rape-Nuts | ||||
www.thedailyshow.com | ||||
|
The speed of language
"After studying the readouts, the researchers found that in these normally reading adults, word identification, grammar and pronunciation all activated parts of Broca's area—and in a very neatly defined sequence. Like clockwork, it took about 200 milliseconds to identify a word, 320 milliseconds for grammatical composition and 450 milliseconds for phonological encoding."
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=language-process-speed-location
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=language-process-speed-location
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)